Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6500 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-6500 is 982 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i5-6500 - CA$59.57 vs CA$118.88
- Up to 49% better value when playing Control than Core i5-6500 - CA$0.3 vs CA$0.59 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6500 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6500
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than FX-6300 - 201 vs 199 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
199
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$59.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$59.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5658 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
201
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.59/FPS
50%
Price, CA$
CA$118.88
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$118.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5659 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i5-6500 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |