Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10500 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10500 is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i5-10500 - CA$59.57 vs CA$175.0
- Up to 62% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-10500 - CA$0.35 vs CA$0.92 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10500
- Performs up to 13% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-6300 - 190 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
168
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$59.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$59.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
190
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.92/FPS
38%
Price, CA$
CA$175
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i5-10500 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |