Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 3438 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - CA$120.26 vs CA$278.98
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 36% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-4350 - 206 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 20 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$120.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
Buy for CA$278.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |