Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2878 days newer than FX-4350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 18% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-4350 - 199 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 12 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for CA$174.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74982 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |