Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600KF outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14600KF is 4011 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i5-14600KF - CA$36.09 vs CA$434.43
- Up to 88% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i5-14600KF - CA$0.23 vs CA$1.91 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600KF
- Performs up to 46% better in World of Warcraft than FX-4300 - 227 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 20 vs 4 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
155
68%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.09
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
227
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.91/FPS
12%
Price, CA$
CA$434.43
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$434.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | Intel Core i5-14600KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |