Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14600KF is 3970 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600KF
- Performs up to 7% better in Stray than Celeron G1620 - 189 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i5-14600KF - CA$32.99 vs CA$307.99
- Up to 88% better value when playing Stray than Core i5-14600KF - CA$0.19 vs CA$1.63 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
189
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.63/FPS
11.656441717791411%
Price, CA$
CA$307.99
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$307.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 222 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
176
93.12169312169311%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$32.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$32.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 223 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
14.770675334055616%
Multi-Core
723
4.623944742900997%
Intel Core i5-14600KF | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |