Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 1631 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 86% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1600 - CA$36.09 vs CA$250.0
- Up to 85% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen 5 1600 - CA$0.23 vs CA$1.54 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 5% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than FX-4300 - 162 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 12 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
154
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.09
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12946 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
162
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.54/FPS
14%
Price, CA$
CA$250
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12947 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Summit Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |