Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - CA$36.09 vs CA$234.99
- Up to 84% better value when playing Control than Core i5-10600K - CA$0.18 vs CA$1.16 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than FX-4300 - 203 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
199
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.09
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
203
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.16/FPS
15%
Price, CA$
CA$234.99
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$234.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |