Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 3725 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i5-13400 - CA$36.09 vs CA$272.83
- Up to 83% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i5-13400 - CA$0.17 vs CA$1.01 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 30% better in Battlefield V than FX-4300 - 269 vs 207 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
207
76.95167286245353%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.17/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.09
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1954 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
269
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.01/FPS
16.831683168316832%
Price, CA$
CA$272.83
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$272.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1963 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |