Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1246 days newer than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-13900F - 128 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 29% better in Grand Theft Auto V than EPYC 7742 - 161 vs 125 FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
161
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.95/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$474.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$474.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Rome | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 24 |
128 | Threads | 32 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
225 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.5x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |