Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600X is 79 days older than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 64 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Performs up to 1% better in Monster Hunter: World than EPYC 7551P - 254 vs 252 FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 95 vs 180 Watts
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
254
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.56/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$141.17
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$141.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 224 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551P | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Naples | Codename | Summit Ridge |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 6 |
64 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |