Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7443P outperforms Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7443P is 797 days newer than Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7443P
- Performs up to 2% better in Death Stranding than Core i5-9400F - 230 vs 225 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 48 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than AMD EPYC 7443P - 65 vs 200 Watts
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
225
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.52/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$117.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$117.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 15th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7443P | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 15th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
Milan | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
48 | Threads | 6 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
200 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.5x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |