Buy on Amazon
CA$87.12
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7282 outperforms FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7282 is 2856 days newer than FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Performs up to 4% better in Dead Space than FX-8150 - 150 vs 144 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 120 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 32 vs 8 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
144
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-Series FX-8150 CPU Used 8-Core 8-Thread Desktop Processor 3.6 GHz 8M 125W Socket AM3+
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7282
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| EPYC | Collection | FX |
| Rome | Codename | Zambezi |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
