Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7282 outperforms Core i3-8100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7282 is 671 days newer than Core i3-8100.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Performs up to 14% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i3-8100 - 226 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 65 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
199
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$126.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$126.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7830 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i3-8100 |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
Rome | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
120 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |