Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 1042 days newer than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 168% better in Immortals of Aveum than Athlon 3000G - 102 vs 38 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 32 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$629 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75681 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
32.18970736629667%
Multi-Core
1975
9.82538182179991%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |