Buy on Amazon
CA$514.96
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $374
Availability
MSRP in USD: $374
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700KF outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700KF is 316 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700KF - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700KF
- Performs up to 50% better in Diablo IV than Athlon 3000G - 217 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel BX80684I79700KF Core i7-9700KF Desktop Processor 8 Cores Up to 4.9 GHz Turbo Unlocked Without Processor Graphics
Buy for CA$514.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 191 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Core i7-9700KF
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
57.442977190876356%
Multi-Core
1975
27.78950330659913%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i7-9700KF |
|---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| Athlon | Collection | Core i7 |
| Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Athlon 3000G or Core i7-9700KF
Diablo IV, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
1 FPS
CA$659.99/FPS
Radeon RX 580
Athlon 3000G
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
CA$659.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
