Buy on Amazon
CA$398.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700 outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700 is 162 days newer than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Performs up to 6% better in Escape From Tarkov than Athlon 3000G - 211 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 16 vs 4 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i7-10700 Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.8 GHz LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 65W, BX8070110700
Buy for CA$398.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 267 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Core i7-10700
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
60.53130929791271%
Multi-Core
1975
28.17403708987161%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i7-10700 |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Athlon | Collection | Core i7 |
| Picasso | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Athlon 3000G or Core i7-10700
Escape From Tarkov, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
93 FPS
CA$7.1/FPS
Radeon RX 580
Athlon 3000G
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
CA$659.99
In Stock
102 FPS
CA$20.56/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i7-10700
32 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
CA$2,096.62
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
