Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 211 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 6% better in Elden Ring than Athlon 3000G - 123 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
123
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.04/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$497.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$497.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10804 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i7 |
Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |