Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400 outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-8400 is 776 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-8400 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 5% better in No Man's Sky than Athlon 3000G - 174 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 6 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$175.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75120 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
70.73170731707317%
Multi-Core
1975
41.596461668070766%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i5-8400 |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |