Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7640X outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-7640X is 877 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than Intel Core i5-7640X - 35 vs 112 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-7640X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7640X
- Performs up to 5% better in Fortnite than Athlon 3000G - 231 vs 220 FPS
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
231
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.29/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$298.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$298.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3295 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
54.34412265758092%
Multi-Core
1975
37.44075829383886%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i5-7640X |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 112 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |