Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7640X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7640X is 1039 days older than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7640X
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 22 than Core i7-10700F - 281 vs 279 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Up to 8% cheaper than Core i5-7640X - CA$357.87 vs CA$387.75
- Up to 7% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i5-7640X - CA$1.28 vs CA$1.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i5-7640X - 65 vs 112 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7640X - 16 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
281
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.38/FPS
92%
Price, CA$
CA$387.75
92%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$387.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
279
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.28/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$357.87
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$357.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7640X | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
112 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |