Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 596 days newer than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Celeron G4900 - 200 vs 199 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for CA$44.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75222 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
64.36781609195403%
Multi-Core
1051
53.21518987341772%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Athlon | Collection | Celeron |
Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |