Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Athlon 200GE on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 200GE is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 602 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 200GE.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - CA$78.5 vs CA$274.32
- Up to 64% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i3-10320 - CA$0.43 vs CA$1.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 27% better in F1 23 than Athlon 200GE - 230 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 8 vs 4 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
FPS
181
78%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$78.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$78.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
230
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.19/FPS
36%
Price, CA$
CA$274.32
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$274.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 200GE | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Sep 6th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i3 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |