The Radeon R9 390X is a much slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 3050. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 390X
The GeForce RTX 3050 is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 3050
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 53% less energy – 130 vs 275 Watts
Radeon R9 390X vs GeForce RTX 3050 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 390X
Jun 18th, 2015
Average FPS
69
83%
Min 1% FPS
35
80%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 3050
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
83
100%
Min 1% FPS
44
100%
Price, CA$
CA$293.16
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.53/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
CA$293.16
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$481.26
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$269.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$368.20
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$369.30
In Stock
Radeon R9 390X vs GeForce RTX 3050 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 390X vs GeForce RTX 3050 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 390X vs GeForce RTX 3050 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 390X
Jun 18th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
67.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
184.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.914 TFLOPS
65%
GeForce RTX 3050
Jan 4th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
58%
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
85%
Texture Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
77%
FP32
9.098 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 390X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 3050 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jun 18th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
$429.00 | MSRP | $249.00 |
Pirate Islands | Generation | GeForce 30 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
275 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
512-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
384 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
67.2 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 56.86 GPixel/s |
184.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 142.2 GTexel/s |
5.914 TFLOPS | FP32 | 9.098 TFLOPS |