Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GeForce RTX 3050 outperforms GeForce 210 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing GeForce RTX 3050 is 4467 days newer than GeForce 210.
Advantages of GeForce RTX 3050
- Performs up to 142% better in Starfield than GeForce 210 - 29 vs 12 FPS
- Up to 42% better value when playing Starfield than GeForce 210 - CA$10.69 vs CA$18.56 per FPS
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 210 - 8 vs 0 GB
Advantages of GeForce 210
- Consumes up to 76% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 - 31 vs 130 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
29
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$10.69/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$309.99
71%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$309.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 209 minutes ago
Buy for CA$222.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 205 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce RTX 3050 | vs | GeForce 210 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2009 |
GeForce 30 | Generation | GeForce 200 |
$249 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 0.5 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | DDR3 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
224 GB/s | Bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s |
1552 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 520 MHz |
1777 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 400 MHz |