The Radeon R9 270X is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R9 270X
- Consumes up to 16% less energy – 180 vs 215 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
51
47%
Min 1% FPS
23
38%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Jul 9th, 2019
Average FPS
108
100%
Min 1% FPS
61
100%
Price, CA$
CA$2392.23
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$22.15/FPS
100%
Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
40%
Pixel Fillrate
33.6 GPixel/s
30%
Texture Fillrate
84 GTexel/s
30%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
30%
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Jul 9th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
113.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
283.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.062 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 270X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 9th, 2019 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $499.00 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 20 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
180 W | Power Consumption | 215 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
33.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 113.3 GPixel/s |
84 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 283.2 GTexel/s |
2.688 TFLOPS | FP32 | 9.062 TFLOPS |