The Radeon R9 270X is a much slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
- A much faster gaming GPU than the Radeon R9 270X
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than the Radeon R9 270X – 70 vs 180 Watts
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than the Radeon R9 270X – 6 vs 2 GB
Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
51
70%
Min 1% FPS
23
62%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
Feb 2nd, 2024
Average FPS
73
100%
Min 1% FPS
37
100%
Price, CA$
CA$420.25
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.76/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
CA$420.25
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$368.67
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$436.58
In Stock
Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
33%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
33.6 GPixel/s
71%
Texture Fillrate
84 GTexel/s
79%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
40%
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
Feb 2nd, 2024
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
168 GB/s
94%
Pixel Fillrate
47.04 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
105.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
6.774 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 270X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 2nd, 2024 |
| $199.00 | MSRP | $179.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 30 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 180 W | Power Consumption | 70 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 96-bit |
179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 168 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 33.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 47.04 GPixel/s |
| 84 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 105.8 GTexel/s |
| 2.688 TFLOPS | FP32 | 6.774 TFLOPS |
