The GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is a clear winner – it's a much faster gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti and it's also a better value for money, as it's only CA$8.08 more expensive!
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
- Up to 0% cheaper – CA$2500.00 vs CA$2508.08
- Consumes up to 16% less energy – 180 vs 215 Watts
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Jul 9th, 2019
Average FPS
108
100%
Min 1% FPS
61
100%
Price, CA$
CA$2508.08
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$23.22/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
Nov 2nd, 2017
Average FPS
87
81%
Min 1% FPS
47
77%
Price, CA$
CA$2500
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$28.73/FPS
81%
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Jul 9th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
113.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
283.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.062 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
Nov 2nd, 2017
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256.3 GB/s
57%
Pixel Fillrate
107.7 GPixel/s
95%
Texture Fillrate
255.8 GTexel/s
90%
FP32
8.186 TFLOPS
90%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jul 9th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 2nd, 2017 |
$499.00 | MSRP | $399.00 |
GeForce 20 | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
215 W | Power Consumption | 180 W |
Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
448 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256.3 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
113.3 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 107.7 GPixel/s |
283.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 255.8 GTexel/s |
9.062 TFLOPS | FP32 | 8.186 TFLOPS |