The Radeon 780M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 3050. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon 780M
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 15 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 3050
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Radeon 780M vs GeForce RTX 3050 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon 780M
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
59
71%
Min 1% FPS
28
64%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 3050
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
83
100%
Min 1% FPS
44
100%
Price, CA$
CA$293.16
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.53/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
CA$293.16
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$481.26
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$269.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$368.20
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$369.30
In Stock
Radeon 780M vs GeForce RTX 3050 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon 780M vs GeForce RTX 3050 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon 780M vs GeForce RTX 3050 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon 780M
Jan 8th, 2024
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
86.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
129.6 GTexel/s
91%
FP32
8.294 TFLOPS
91%
GeForce RTX 3050
Jan 4th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
66%
Texture Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.098 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon 780M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 3050 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $249.00 |
| Navi III IGP | Generation | GeForce 30 |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
15 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Memory | ||
| System-Shared | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| System-Shared | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| System-Shared | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
86.4 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 56.86 GPixel/s |
| 129.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 142.2 GTexel/s |
| 8.294 TFLOPS | FP32 | 9.098 TFLOPS |
