The Radeon 760M is at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon R7 250. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon 760M
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 15 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon R7 250
The Radeon 760M is better in every way
Radeon 760M vs Radeon R7 250 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon 760M
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
56
100%
Min 1% FPS
26
100%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Please refine your search results or...
Shoot us an email and we'll quickly add this!
Radeon R7 250
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
42
75%
Min 1% FPS
16
62%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Please refine your search results or...
Shoot us an email and we'll quickly add this!
Radeon 760M vs Radeon R7 250 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon 760M vs Radeon R7 250 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon 760M vs Radeon R7 250 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon 760M
Jan 8th, 2024
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
41.58 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
83.17 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.323 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon R7 250
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
1 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
14.8 GPixel/s
36%
Texture Fillrate
29.6 GTexel/s
36%
FP32
947.2 GFLOPS
18%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon 760M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R7 250 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| Navi III IGP | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
15 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Memory | ||
| System-Shared | Memory Size | 1 GB |
| System-Shared | Memory Type | DDR3 |
| System-Shared | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
41.58 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 14.8 GPixel/s |
83.17 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 29.6 GTexel/s |
5.323 TFLOPS | FP32 | 947.2 GFLOPS |
