The Radeon R7 250 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 7600 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon R7 250
- Consumes up to 71% less energy – 55 vs 190 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 7600 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 1500% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 1 GB
Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon RX 7600 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R7 250
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
42
37%
Min 1% FPS
16
24%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 7600 XT
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
115
100%
Min 1% FPS
66
100%
Price, CA$
CA$509.99
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.43/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
CA$509.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$578.15
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$579.99
In Stock
Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon RX 7600 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon RX 7600 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon RX 7600 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R7 250
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
1 GB
6%
Memory Bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
10%
Pixel Fillrate
14.8 GPixel/s
8%
Texture Fillrate
29.6 GTexel/s
8%
FP32
947.2 GFLOPS
4%
Radeon RX 7600 XT
Jan 8th, 2024
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
176.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
352.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
22.57 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R7 250 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 7600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $329.00 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Navi III |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
55 W | Power Consumption | 190 W |
| Memory | ||
| 1 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 28.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 14.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 176.3 GPixel/s |
| 29.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 352.6 GTexel/s |
| 947.2 GFLOPS | FP32 | 22.57 TFLOPS |
