The Radeon 760M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 3050. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon 760M
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 15 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 3050
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Radeon 760M vs GeForce RTX 3050 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon 760M
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
56
67%
Min 1% FPS
26
59%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 3050
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
83
100%
Min 1% FPS
44
100%
Price, CA$
CA$293.16
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.53/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
CA$293.16
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$481.26
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$269.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$368.20
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
CA$369.30
In Stock
Radeon 760M vs GeForce RTX 3050 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon 760M vs GeForce RTX 3050 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon 760M vs GeForce RTX 3050 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon 760M
Jan 8th, 2024
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
41.58 GPixel/s
73%
Texture Fillrate
83.17 GTexel/s
58%
FP32
5.323 TFLOPS
59%
GeForce RTX 3050
Jan 4th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.098 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon 760M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 3050 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $249.00 |
| Navi III IGP | Generation | GeForce 30 |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
15 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Memory | ||
| System-Shared | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| System-Shared | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| System-Shared | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 41.58 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 56.86 GPixel/s |
| 83.17 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 142.2 GTexel/s |
| 5.323 TFLOPS | FP32 | 9.098 TFLOPS |
