Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Arc A770 outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Arc A770 is 1948 days newer than the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3100.
Advantages of Intel Arc A770
- Performs up to 69% better in Rust than Radeon Pro WX 3100 - 147 vs 87 FPS
- Up to 7% better value when playing Rust than Radeon Pro WX 3100 - CA$3.06 vs CA$3.28 per FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 - 16 vs 4 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
- Up to 37% cheaper than Arc A770 - CA$285.09 vs CA$449.99
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than Intel Arc A770 - 65 vs 225 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
147
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.06/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$449.99
63%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$449.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
FPS
87
59%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.28/FPS
93%
Price, CA$
CA$285.09
100%
Buy for CA$285.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
6%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
6%
Intel Arc A770 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 12th, 2017 |
Alchemist | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$329 | MSRP | $199 |
1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
256-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
2100 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
2400 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
2000 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |