Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GeForce RTX 3050 outperforms the more expensive Radeon Pro WX 3100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing GeForce RTX 3050 is 1667 days newer than the more expensive Radeon Pro WX 3100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 - 65 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050
- Performs up to 108% better in Starfield than Radeon Pro WX 3100 - 27 vs 13 FPS
- Up to 7% cheaper than Radeon Pro WX 3100 - CA$252.43 vs CA$270.9
- Up to 55% better value when playing Starfield than Radeon Pro WX 3100 - CA$9.35 vs CA$20.84 per FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 - 8 vs 4 GB
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
FPS
13
48%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$20.84/FPS
44%
Price, CA$
CA$270.9
93%
Buy for CA$270.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2181 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
27
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$9.35/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$252.43
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$252.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2182 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
34%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
27%
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 |
---|---|---|
Jun 12th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 30 |
$199 | MSRP | $249 |
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1552 MHz |
1219 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1777 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |