Key Differences
In short — Arc A770 outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro W6400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon Pro W6400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Arc A770 is 266 days newer than the cheaper Radeon Pro W6400.
Advantages of Intel Arc A770
- Performs up to 50% better in Rust than Radeon Pro W6400 - 147 vs 98 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro W6400 - 16 vs 4 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6400
- Up to 43% cheaper than Arc A770 - CA$340.92 vs CA$599.99
- Up to 15% better value when playing Rust than Arc A770 - CA$3.48 vs CA$4.08 per FPS
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than Intel Arc A770 - 50 vs 225 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
147
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.08/FPS
85%
Price, CA$
CA$599.99
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$599.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 355 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
FPS
98
66%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.48/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$340.92
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$340.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 355 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
24%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
18%
Intel Arc A770 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro W6400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
Alchemist | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$329 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
256-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
2100 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
2400 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
2000 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |