Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 950 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 950 is 1412 days older than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 - 65 vs 90 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 - 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
- Performs up to 4% better in Ready or Not than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 95 vs 91 FPS
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
91
95.78947368421052%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$260.71
100%
Buy for CA$260.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74628 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Desktop • Aug 20th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
54.49763282482903%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
72.67625394598386%
Desktop • Aug 20th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
38.02 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
57.02 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 20th, 2015 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 900 |
$199 | MSRP | $159 |
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 105.8 GB/s |
1295 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1024 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1188 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1653 MHz |