Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 3200 outperforms the cheaper GeForce 210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce 210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 3550 days newer than the cheaper GeForce 210.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Performs up to 2% better in F1 23 than GeForce 210 - 165 vs 162 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 210 - 4 vs 0.5 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 210
- Up to 53% cheaper than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - CA$104.23 vs CA$220.59
- Up to 52% better value when playing F1 23 than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - CA$0.64 vs CA$1.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 31 vs 65 Watts
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
165
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.34/FPS
47%
Price, CA$
CA$220.59
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$220.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
FPS
162
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$104.23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$104.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce 210 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2009 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 200 |
$199 | MSRP | Not Available |
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 0.5 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | DDR3 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s |
1295 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 520 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 400 MHz |