Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 950 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 950 is 654 days older than Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
- Performs up to 7% better in Ready or Not than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 95 vs 89 FPS
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 - 35 vs 90 Watts
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
FPS
89
93.6842105263158%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$166.3
100%
Buy for CA$166.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 20th, 2015
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Aug 20th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
38.02 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
57.02 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
51.28879537085744%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
68.41459137144861%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
---|---|---|
Aug 20th, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
GeForce 900 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$159 | MSRP | $149 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
105.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
1024 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
1188 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
1653 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |