In The Last of Us Part II, the Xeon w3-2425 is slower than the Core i3-330M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon w3-2425
- Is 13 years and 1 month newer – Feb 15, 2023 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 13 years and 1 month newer
Core i3-330M
- Up to 26% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 216 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 26% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Xeon w3-2425 vs Core i3-330M: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
216 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon w3-2425 vs Core i3-330M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon w3-2425 vs Core i3-330M in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon w3-2425
Feb 15th, 2023
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
15 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4400 MHz
100%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
20%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
24%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon w3-2425 Feb 15th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Feb 15th, 2023 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| $529.00 | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA4677 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 4400 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
