In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-330M is faster than the Ryzen 9 9900X3D and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $470 cheaper!
Core i3-330M
- Up to 24% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 217 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 24% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 83% cheaper – $98.95 vs $569.00
- Up to 83% cheaper
- Up to 86% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.45 vs $3.25/FPS
- Up to 86% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 71% less energy – 35 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 71% less energy
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
- Is 14 years and 11 months newer – Jan 06, 2025 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 14 years and 11 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-330M vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
217 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Average FPS
175 FPS
81%
Min 1% FPS
131 FPS
81%
Price, $
$569
17%
Value, $/FPS
$3.25/FPS
14%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-330M vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-330M vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
3 MB
2%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
48%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
19%
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 9900X3D Jan 6th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Released | Jan 6th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $599.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG1 | Socket | AM5 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1066 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
