Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 2163 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 145 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 53% better in Starfield than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 84 vs 55 FPS
- Up to 74% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $500.88 vs $1900.00
- Up to 83% better value when playing Starfield than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $5.96 vs $34.55 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $1,900 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
84
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.96/FPS
100%
Price, $
$500.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $500.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 16 |
44 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 170 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |