Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 1836 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 44 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 23% better in World of Warcraft than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 221 vs 180 FPS
- Up to 86% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $269.95 vs $1900.00
- Up to 88% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $1.22 vs $10.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 125 vs 145 Watts
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $1,900 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
221
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$269.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $269.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 16 |
44 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |