Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Xeon E5-2690 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 3050 days newer than Xeon E5-2690 v3.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2690 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 7600 - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 21% better in Battlefield 2042 than Xeon E5-2690 v3 - 187 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 - 65 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
187
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
100%
Price, $
$197.91
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $197.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 122 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2690 v3 | vs | Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
135 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |