In Rust, the Xeon E5-2667 is quite a bit slower than the Core Ultra 7 265KF and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $626 more expensive!
Xeon E5-2667
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 7 265KF
- Up to 35% faster in Rust – 284 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 35% faster in Rust
- Is 12 years and 7 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 12 years and 7 months newer
- Up to 68% cheaper – $298.98 vs $925.00
- Up to 68% cheaper
- Up to 76% better value in Rust – $1.05 vs $4.40/FPS
- Up to 76% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 125 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2667 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2667
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
210 FPS
74%
Min 1% FPS
42 FPS
45%
Price, $
$925
32%
Value, $/FPS
$4.4/FPS
24%
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
284 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
94 FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.05/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2667 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2667 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2667
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
6-core
30%
L3 Cache
15 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
64%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2667 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
