In Rust, the Xeon E5-2667 is slower than the Core Ultra 5 245KF and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $710 more expensive!
Xeon E5-2667
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 5 245KF
- Up to 32% faster in Rust – 279 vs 211 FPS
- Up to 32% faster in Rust
- Is 12 years and 7 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 12 years and 7 months newer
- Up to 77% cheaper – $214.99 vs $925.00
- Up to 77% cheaper
- Up to 82% better value in Rust – $0.77 vs $4.38/FPS
- Up to 82% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 125 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2667 vs Core Ultra 5 245KF: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2667
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
211 FPS
76%
Min 1% FPS
43 FPS
47%
Price, $
$925
23%
Value, $/FPS
$4.38/FPS
18%
Core Ultra 5 245KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
279 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
91 FPS
100%
Price, $
$214.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2667 vs Core Ultra 5 245KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2667 vs Core Ultra 5 245KF in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2667
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
6-core
43%
L3 Cache
15 MB
62%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
67%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 5 245KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2667 Mar 6th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 245KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $294.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
