The Xeon E5-2660 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-13400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Xeon E5-2660
The Core i5-13400F is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i5-13400F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
Xeon E5-2660 vs Core i5-13400F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Xeon E5-2660
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
167
81%
Min 1% FPS
112
83%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
205
100%
Min 1% FPS
135
100%
Price, $
$889.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.34/FPS
100%
Xeon E5-2660 vs Core i5-13400F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2660 vs Core i5-13400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2660 vs Core i5-13400F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2660
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
80%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
65%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Xeon E5-2660 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $196.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | Not Available |
| Performance | ||
| 8 | Cores | 10 |
| 16 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 GHz |
| 20 MB | L3 Cache | 20 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
