In Atomfall, the Xeon E5-2650 v2 is slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $158 cheaper!
Xeon E5-2650 v2
- Up to 55% cheaper – $129.94 vs $288.00
- Up to 55% cheaper
- Up to 43% better value in Atomfall – $0.67 vs $1.17/FPS
- Up to 43% better value in Atomfall
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 28% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 192 FPS
- Up to 28% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 4 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 11 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2650 v2 vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2650 v2
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
192 FPS
78%
Min 1% FPS
144 FPS
78%
Price, $
$129.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$288
45%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
57%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2650 v2 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2650 v2 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2650 v2
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
8-core
40%
L3 Cache
20 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
64%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2650 v2 Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
