In Atomfall, the Xeon E5-2650 v2 is slower than the Core Ultra 5 245KF. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $85 cheaper!
Xeon E5-2650 v2
- Up to 40% cheaper – $129.94 vs $214.99
- Up to 40% cheaper
- Up to 23% better value in Atomfall – $0.67 vs $0.87/FPS
- Up to 23% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Core Ultra 5 245KF
- Up to 28% faster in Atomfall – 246 vs 192 FPS
- Up to 28% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 1 month newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 11 years and 1 month newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-2650 v2 vs Core Ultra 5 245KF: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-2650 v2
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
192 FPS
78%
Min 1% FPS
144 FPS
78%
Price, $
$129.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 5 245KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$214.99
60%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
77%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-2650 v2 vs Core Ultra 5 245KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-2650 v2 vs Core Ultra 5 245KF in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-2650 v2
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
8-core
57%
L3 Cache
20 MB
83%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
65%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 5 245KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-2650 v2 Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 245KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $294.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1851 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
