Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Xeon E5-2420 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3412 days newer than Xeon E5-2420 v2.
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 11% better in Dead Space than Xeon E5-2420 v2 - 160 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 - 16 vs 12 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
160
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$849.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $849.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7504 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2420 v2 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge EN | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
80 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |