Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Xeon E5-2420 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 3412 days newer than Xeon E5-2420 v2.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2420 v2
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D - 80 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 16% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Xeon E5-2420 v2 - 134 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5-2420 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2420 v2 | vs | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Ivy Bridge EN | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 120 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
